OneBlink vs Jotform:
Which is better for your organisation?

While the entry level for Jotform is more affordable, it comes with strict limitations on form creation and monthly form submissions, which may pose challenges for growing teams or high-traffic use cases.

In contrast, OneBlink is built for scale - offering unlimited forms and data storage, and supporting up to 60,000 submissions annually. This makes OneBlink well-suited for growing teams, complex workflows and managing high volumes of form data.

Both platforms offer strong form-building functionality, but OneBlink delivers greater flexibility out-of-the-box, with more field types, built-in validation, and support for contextual pre-filling. Jotform relies more heavily on widgets and manual workarounds to achieve similar outcomes.

For public sector teams working with accessibility, compliance, or mobile-first requirements, OneBlink’s approach ensures fewer compromises and faster time to deployment.

OneBlink stands out with its ability to automate form submissions using multi-step approvals, logic-based triggers, and back-end API actions. It supports both no-code and developer workflows that adapt to complex real-world scenarios.

Jotform offers basic approval flows, but lacks granular event triggers or dynamic backend actions, making it more suitable for simple form routing than enterprise-grade automation.

While both platforms support mobile-friendly experiences, only OneBlink enables full deployment as a Progressive Web App (PWA). This gives users a seamless, branded interface with offline support and deep device integration.

Jotform Apps, while easy to configure, remain browser-dependent and fall short of true PWA capability, especially in field-based or offline contexts.

OneBlink empowers business users to create lookup lists, dynamic fields, and integrations without developer input - unlocking faster delivery and greater control. Jotform does offer more native integrations but lacks key no-code tools for building reusable logic and prefilled data sets.

For teams that want to move fast without waiting on IT, OneBlink reduces friction while still offering strong governance controls.

OneBlink is built for extensibility, offering hosted APIs, SDKs, and CDN support for fully bespoke form experiences. This makes it easy to plug into existing infrastructure or deliver advanced use cases.

Jotform provides a public API, but stops short of offering developer environments or deeper customisation paths, requiring external workarounds for even modest extensions.

Both platforms meet Multi-factor authentication standards (MFA), but OneBlink goes further by offering regional data sovereignty - crucial for Government. Jotform limits this capability to its Enterprise plan. OneBlink is also ISO 27001 compliant, a requirement for most Government agencies looking to adopt new software solutions.

For teams with strict compliance mandates, OneBlink provides more assurance around data control, hosting transparency, and ongoing governance.

OneBlink is designed to meet accessibility standards by default, ensuring that all form users, including those using assistive technologies, have a consistent experience.

Jotform partially meets WCAG 2.1 A and AA, but only with its Classic Form layout, placing the burden of accessibility compliance on the form builder rather than the platform.