OneBlink vs iAuditor:
Inspection tools compared
SafetyCulture iAuditor is widely recognised for its inspection and audit capabilities, particularly in safety, compliance, and operational checks. But when inspections require more flexibility, custom form logic, advanced approvals, integrations, or even developer tools - how does it compare to OneBlink? This side-by-side checklist breaks down the features available in iAuditor’s first paid tier and contrasts them with OneBlink’s no-code, low-code and developer options, helping you decide which platform best supports your organisation’s inspection and reporting needs.
:quality(80)/f/307284/7314x4876/56aa551528/safetyculture-iauditor-comparison.jpg)
:quality(75)/f/307284/1070x557/0eb5e86fa2/client-logo-05.png)
:quality(75)/f/307284/154x80/c0c450ed90/lincoln-county-small.png)
:quality(75)/f/307284/1069x557/7bb0054a52/client-logo-01.png)
:quality(75)/f/307284/1070x557/b373d9e932/client-logo-02.png)
:quality(75)/f/307284/154x80/6c954683a0/brookhaven-logo-small.png)
:quality(75)/f/307284/1069x557/ca74f4ba36/client-logo-06.png)
SafetyCulture iAuditor has carved out a strong reputation as a mobile-first tool purpose-built for inspections and audits. It helps teams standardise safety checks, streamline incident reporting, and generate templated inspection reports quickly. For many organisations, especially those with relatively straightforward compliance needs, iAuditor’s first paid tier offers a simple and effective path to digitising manual inspection processes. However, as inspection workflows become more complex, requiring dynamic forms, conditional logic, multi-step approvals, integration with internal systems, or fine-grained access controls, iAuditor’s out-of-the-box configuration may start to show its limitations.
In contrast, OneBlink is designed to support the full lifecycle of modern inspection and audit processes. Its platform combines no-code tools for business users, low-code flexibility for IT teams, and developer-grade tools for full extensibility. This enables organisations to not only replace paper-based inspections but to evolve them, embedding workflows, automated triggers, contextual data, and even API-driven integrations with systems like SharePoint, CRMs, GIS, and asset platforms. Whether inspections are conducted in the field, approved across multiple departments, or routed through compliance teams, OneBlink provides the infrastructure to handle it.
This comparison evaluates how SafetyCulture iAuditor’s Premium Plan stacks up against OneBlink across a wide range of inspection-related capabilities. Research for this comparison was conducted via GPT-powered analysis of publicly available documentation, platform help centres, and product support resources to ensure an accurate and current feature assessment. From form creation and offline access, to automation, branding, integration, and developer extensibility, this guide will help you assess which platform is better aligned with your organisation’s current and future inspection needs.
Entry Level Plan Overview
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
Form Creation Limits Total number of forms users can create | UNLIMITED | UNLIMITED |
Monthly Form Submission Capacity Number of form submissions allowed each month | 5,000 | UNLIMITED |
Data Storage Limits Upload storage available for form responses | UNLIMITED | 500 gb |
Comparison Summary
Entry Level Plans
Both platforms offer generous entry-level plans, with SafetyCulture iAuditor providing strong value for teams conducting inspections within the confines of its templated structure. Unlimited forms and generous storage make it a practical starting point for organisations focused purely on safety and audit workflows.
However, OneBlink goes further, not only offering unlimited forms, submissions, and builder access, but doing so in a way that scales more flexibly across internal teams. With no licensing restrictions on the number of users who can build or use forms, OneBlink allows broader team collaboration and faster rollout of custom inspection processes.
Form Building Capabilities
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
Form Builder Users Number of people who can use the form builder | UNLIMITED | 1 |
Number of Form Field Types Form field variations that can be used | 38 | 15 |
Multi-page Forms Forms split across pages | ||
ReCaptcha Spam protection | ||
Signature Capabilities Ability to capture signature in form | ||
Conditional Logic Display or hide fields based on user responses | ||
Calculations Fields that can perform calculations | ||
Data/Submissions Viewer View submission data | ||
Embed Forms Anywhere Integrate forms into sites without provider branding | ? | |
Form Templates Pre-built form designs | ||
PDF Form Import and Conversion Convert PDFs into forms | ? | |
Form Versioning Track form revisions | ? Partially | |
Archiving Forms Manage whether a form is active or archived | ||
Regex on Form Fields Advanced input validation | ||
Virus Scanning Attachments Scan files on submission for viruses |
Comparison Summary
Form Building Capabilities
SafetyCulture iAuditor covers the essentials for inspection form creation, with 15 field types and support for conditional logic, signatures, and basic calculations. It offers a good toolkit for linear inspection workflows, particularly in field-based environments where templates remain relatively consistent.
OneBlink, by comparison, gives teams significantly more power, offering 38 field types, rich validation (including regex), and dynamic logic. Its ability to embed forms without branding, import from PDFS, and build public-facing versions makes it a far more flexible form builder beyond just inspections.
Workflow Capabilities
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
Generate PDF Receipt Auto-generate PDF copies | ||
Multi step Approval Workflows Layered approval steps | ? Partially | |
Payment Gateways Accept online payments | ||
Calendar Booking Events Schedule events via forms | ||
Submission Events Trigger actions on draft, submission or post approval | ||
IoT Ready Forms pre-populated with contextual data from IoT technology (RFiD, BLE Beacons, NFC, QR Codes) | ? Partially |
Comparison Summary
Workflow Capabilities
iAuditor’s single-step approval feature is helpful for teams that require supervisor sign-off before closing out an inspection. It also supports post-inspection tasks through its built-in Actions module, making it well suited for basic audit loops.
OneBlink builds on this with support for multi-step approvals, submission event triggers, and calendar-based workflows. It allows actions to be automated at any point in the process - draft, submission, or post-approval - and integrates seamlessly into broader operational workflows, which can involve compliance teams, field crews, and management.
App Capabilities
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
Public Users People who can use the app without logging in. | UNLIMITED | ? 0 |
Authenticated Users Number of people who need to sign in to use the app | 100 | ? 1 |
App Type Web App, PWA (Progressive Web App) or Native | PWA | Mobile |
Custom Branding Use your organisation's logo/icon | ||
Custom CSS Customise form appearance | ||
Drafts Capabilities Save form progress | ||
Offline Ready Work without connectivity |
Comparison Summary
App Capabilities
iAuditor provides mobile apps built for field-based inspections, with offline support. It's highly effective for teams in regulated industries conducting scheduled checks or audits in remote areas.
OneBlink matches this with Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) that work across any device, with or without an app store download, and offers both online and offline capabilities. The added flexibility to control user access, support public users, and customise app branding gives OneBlink a distinct advantage for organisations deploying form-based apps beyond inspections.
Advanced Tools
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
Number of out-of-the-box Integrations Connecting external products and platforms | 18 | 1 |
Environments Dev / Test / Prod environments | 1 | |
Lists and Lookups Builder Dynamic data selection | ? Partially | |
Power Automate Connector Microsoft platform and workflow integration | ||
Account Permissioning Manage user permissions | ||
Email Template Builder For custom email notifications |
Comparison Summary
Advanced Tools
While iAuditor offers useful inspection features such as PDF report generation, template archiving, and form versioning, these are often tied to the inspection use case. PDF conversion, for example, is a manual service requiring support team involvement.
OneBlink enables more autonomy, giving users self-serve tools to convert PDFS into smart forms, create reusable templates, manage versions, and even apply advanced input rules using regex. The ability to embed contextual data and configure multi-stage form logic makes OneBlink a more robust platform for inspection and audit scenarios that evolve over time.
Developer Tools
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
API Hosting Host custom API endpoints | ||
CDN Hosting Hosting of bespoke solutions | ||
SDK Developer toolkit |
Comparison Summary
Developer Tools
iAuditor does not support the hosting of custom APIs or front-end extensions like CDN-hosted solutions. All forms are delivered through iAuditors mobile app.
OneBlink offers a full developer suite, with environment support (dev/test/prod), API hosting, and developer SDKs that allow complete extensibility. From custom triggers and webhooks to the creation of external interfaces, OneBlink gives technical teams more tools to build bespoke inspection and audit workflows.
Security
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
ISO 27001 Compliant Meets security standards | ||
Multi-factor Authentication Extra login security | ||
Platform Architecture What is the platform built on | AWS | AWS |
Data Sovereignty Is saved data kept within that region |
Comparison Summary
Security
Both platforms are hosted on AWS and meet global security benchmarks, including ISO 27001 certification and multi-factor authentication support. iAuditor also provides regional data storage options aligned with data sovereignty requirements, ensuring compliance in regulated industries.
Where OneBlink stands out is in its platform flexibility. Security configurations can extend to granular permissioning and access control, all while maintaining compliance with leading security standards.
Accessibility
OneBlink | iAuditor | |
---|---|---|
WCAG Compliant Outputs of platform meet accessibility guidelines | VPAT Available |
Comparison Summary
Accessibility
SafetyCulture iAuditor includes some accessibility support via mobile operating systems, but it does not claim WCAG compliance or provide a detailed VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template). This may limit its suitability in jurisdictions or agencies where digital accessibility is a requirement.
OneBlink is designed to meet accessibility standards by default, ensuring that all form users, including those using assistive technologies, have a consistent experience.

Work better with OneBlink today
Still not sure what makes sense for your team. Whether you have follow-up questions, would like to see a demonstration of the OneBlink platform, or have a challenge you want to test in both OneBlink and SafetyCulture's iAuditor, why not contact us or schedule a discovery call.
